![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The more I teach and train, the less I use Low Ready. In fact, in the CRG courses, I mention it, but we spend no time on it. It was the “state of the art” at one time, but in our opinion, it has been surpassed in utility by more task-specific ready positions. It is a trademark of the Modern Technique trainers, but interestingly, neither Gunsite nor any other Modern technique school invented it. I have a 1942 copy of All-In-Fighting and in the section on using the Enfield in close combat, the Low Ready is discussed.
As better solutions, we have various readies that are either an out growth of the directional draw stroke, or involve positioning the gun as needed based on task examination. A Ready Position can be defined as this: Any time the gun is in your hand it is Ready. This is in contradiction to being unready - ie. still in holster. There are Contact Readies intended to prepare you for shooting immediately as well as for intimidating a potential shootee into disengaging or surrendering. The myth that you can't see the adversary when you are pointed in is just that...a myth. There are also Covert Readies used when you suspect upcoming trouble, but not sure enough to draw to a Contact Ready. Covert Readies follow well after a surreptitious draw. Think of sitting in a restaurant (in a Third World country for example) when three profile-guys walk in and begin positioning themselves. It appears that there will be trouble, but you do not want to start it. If you draw 'hard to the guard" as they teach in some schools, you will precipitate trouble. Going to Covert Ready makes you more, well...Ready. Yet if trouble does not come, you can easily holster with no one being the wiser. Finally, there are Movement Readies that serve to get from Point A to Point B with gun in hand while being muzzle careful. These are not designed to contact anyone as the muzzle is averted. This is where SUL and 1/2 SUL come in. If we needed to find a home for Low Ready (for tradition's sake) this is where it would be. Yet SUL and 1/2 SUL do everything Low Ready does, and better. And regardless of weapon systems! 1). Low Ready gives the adversary time to act or react. Not something I care to give him. 2). If you are threatened with death or injury you are justified in pointing in. If they do anything other than leave you alone or comply, you will have a choice to make. Its a hard choice. No free lunch outside the shoot house. 3). Gun out, muzzle pointed at the deck will be and HAS been seen as a mark of hesitation by bad guys. Weakness is what it is and no technique will make up for it. All I can say is that if you carry, you better have made up your mind about killing. You are either justified in drawing the gun or not. If you are justified in drawing, you are justified in pointing. Moreover, the bad guy will get a message of reluctance to shoot when he sees you in Low Ready, whereas he will get a message of eagerness to shoot when he sees you in Contact (pointed in) Ready. I am all for keeping it simple...but not too simple. We need a variety of Ready To Shoot, and Ready In Movement Positions to be sure. But with our new developments, Low Ready does nothing well enough to warrant keeping it. I vote it into the Tactical Museum.
__________________
Gabe Suarez Warrior Talk Blog Tactical Gear For The Civilian Fighter Training For The Martial Civilian Making you dangerous to your enemies since 1995 |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Well said, as usual! Jack
__________________
AKA G30Jack "Most people find change in their dryer, I find bullets"- My wife Warning shots are for wusses. Fire is for effect. I will remember that if the monsterous creature is within clubbing range, it is a tight situation, and start clubbing. This is true even if my firearm still works. No reason not to club and shoot at the same time. Whacking: The redistribution or impairment of biological functions intended to eliminate intercellular cooperation within a sentient organism. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sorry - but "SUL"? Might even be something I already do, just not familiar with the acronym...
__________________
Not me. Not mine. Not today. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Also,could someone please explain "Half Sul" and give a better decription of Sul as applied to long guns.
Thanks in Advace!
__________________
www.sneakybags.com Sneakybags Facebook Page Sneakybags on Twitter www.onesourcetactical.com |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
SUL meaning pointing south ie. straight down.
so you can turn 360, and scan for more targets without actually covering noncombatants with your muzzle. not clear on 1/2 SUL though --Travis-- Last edited by TravisABQ : 04-19-2005 at 05:30 PM. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
www.sneakybags.com Sneakybags Facebook Page Sneakybags on Twitter www.onesourcetactical.com |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
SUL - Developed by Max Joseph and Alan Brosnan while training third world Spec-ops teams. Allows stacking w/o covering.
For us lowly civilians, SUL allows 360 degree movement and low profile movement ready options. Dinosaurs hate it, but we know what eventually happened to them.
__________________
Gabe Suarez Warrior Talk Blog Tactical Gear For The Civilian Fighter Training For The Martial Civilian Making you dangerous to your enemies since 1995 |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ahh. No, it's not something I've been doing. But I may try it in "dry-runs" here in the house. Unfortunately, my current billet has me protecting a desk from the enemies of democracy - which is likely where I'll remain until retirement from this canoe club...
__________________
Not me. Not mine. Not today. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fascinating stuff here. I've just been starting to fiddle with SUL, and now it looks like I'm going to have to look at this half-SUL. Many thanks for some new ideas.
Cheers, DR |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If you can, make CRGII in Anderson, SC. I'm going and it is pretty close to you. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|