Gunfight Training Gear Store Assault Rifles TSD Custom Shop Signup Newsletter Like Us on Facebook!
Vimeo Videos from SI
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Travelling through uncharted waters.
    Posts
    2,832
    Dale, I don't know about where or when you did Basic, but the only power tool we literally ever saw or used was a floor buffer.

    Yeah, there were some shop worn rifles back then, but not many. Over cleaning or dis/assembly was not a common problem. I was once reminded while I was in the Army that one expression for 'being lazy' was 'soldiering'.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    SAN ANTONIO, TX
    Posts
    870
    Not just basic, but NG units, etc.(Sorry bro I don't have specific dates and places for these acts of stupidity) The over-cleaning and over-breakdown of small arms is an instituitional inertia problem with the military that prematurely wears out rifles.

    Case in point: The USMC took delivery of KAC MK11 (precursor to the M110). These rifles pasted through 6 levels of commands and armorers before being issued to the sniper teams. At every level, the armorers felt the need to check headspace by using a M240 gauge (hey there both 7.62). To do this, they had to punch the one-time use roll pin that holds the ejector in. They then in there infinite wisdom crammed this one-time use roll pin back in. This was done no less than 6 times. The result? Ejection problems with the guns leading to KAC getting the blame for no fault of their own.

    My roundabout point: don't think that a 50 year old rifle will perform as well as modern designs. Especially when they have been subjected to the misguided maintence procedures rampant in our military. It is sad but true. Every single person I have ever talked to that got issued the M14 EBR was completely underwhelmed. From accuracy worse than their M4, to bulk, to the fact the military issued Leupold scopes with 168gr BDC even though 168gr ammo hasn't been used in over a decade.

    Hopefully the Irish took better care of their rifles. I worked with a gentleman that was on the Aussie service rifle team and one of the main rifle instructors for their army. He hated the FAL. To him they were inaccurate, unreliable, loose, finicky rifles that required a lot to squeeze performance out of them. This was in the time period when they selected the AUG to replace the FAL for front line work.

    Worn out guns are worn out guns. Hopefully the IDF don't have worn out guns for the spotters.
    AKA: infidelprodigy

    A bullet in the head is a bullet in the head.....

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Springfield, MA
    Posts
    187
    They did not, Over cleaning and then kicked down to the reserves who did the same thing. I would imagine there may be some that were used by shooting teams or that are in better shape.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Central Alabama
    Posts
    355
    Found a pic, 50.00 model with 21 inch barrel...
    Reverse1.jpg
    Last edited by Tengu Joker; 01-14-2012 at 04:27 PM.
    Mean Little F@&$%r

    "Be smart enough to avoid most problems, mean enough to strike first, and tough enough to fight back if you get hit."

    "If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." Dalai Lama

  5. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by Dale Hunter View Post
    The sad part ia most of these FAL's will have worn out parts and barrels and will still be pressed into service like our old M-14's.

    Now, if they hand select them or overhaul them with new barrels and such (and add Vltor handguards, decent scope) they can have a decent spotter rifle. Time will tell.....

    Some of our OLD M14 after being restocked with a modern stock were getting 3/8" MOA most were 3/4 to 1". I believe anything above 1.5 was sent back to storage. I bet some of those FALs are getting close to 1.5 MOA. Anything less would most likely be sent back to there storage as well. Just because it is OLD doesnt mean it cant shoot good. Hell I have a 03 Springfield that shoots 3/8 all day long and is nearly a 100 years old. Barrel is stamped 7-18 as in 1918. Now imagine if you put a high dollar US Optics sniper scope on her! You would have a hell of a sniper rifle. Would be as fancy as a M21 but still a great platform. The barrel would heat up quick compared to a M21. Now having said that Im sure somewhere down the line a turd or two popped up. They are old and if not properly taken care of or had worn out parts replaced then they would have problems and some did. To me thats the armorers fault and should have been addressed at the time they were "refurbished". Plus Im not a fan of Leopold scopes. They would not be my first or even 2nd or 3rd choice for that matter. I believe most problems with the OLD M14 were related to the Leopold scopes as far as accuracy.
    Last edited by American Infidel; 01-14-2012 at 10:37 PM.
    Socialism is a philosophy of failure,the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy,its inherent
    virtue is the equal sharing of misery.
    (Winston Churchill)

  6. #26
    hermosabeach Guest
    I think the bigger picture- you are the spotter- not the sniper-
    Do you want .556 or .308 as your system to cover your 6??????????????

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •