Gunfight Training Gear Store Assault Rifles TSD Custom Shop Signup Newsletter Like Us on Facebook!
MG-G4 Ultralight Lower - In Stock
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26
  1. #11
    The irish army does peace keeping, but they aren't exactly a combat force unlike the British.

    On an aside note, the Accuracy International was set up by a British Civilian olympian. Maybe that will teach the British that civilian sport shooting has relevancy to national defence.....nope, probably not.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Central Alabama
    Posts
    355
    Quote Originally Posted by JamesOC View Post
    They have Fal's they don't have scars. They don't have much money.
    Just comparing old to new JamesOC ...
    Mean Little F@&$%r

    "Be smart enough to avoid most problems, mean enough to strike first, and tough enough to fight back if you get hit."

    "If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." Dalai Lama

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Pirates have No Borders
    Posts
    32,552
    Actually it is a fine choice. The FAL makes much more sense than the SCAR. They have plenty of magazines, and parts, and probably all manner of armorer support. All which they would have to re-acquire for the SCAR. And to what end really? The FAL, properly scoped and with good ammunition, can hit to 800 yards with no issues at all...even for civilian guerrillas. I have two such rifles and they are each 1.5 MOA guns.
    Gabe Suarez

    Warrior Talk Blog
    Tactical Gear For The Civilian Fighter
    Training For The Martial Civilian

    God - Family - Tribe
    That Is Where Loyalty Lies
    And Those Are The Only Things
    I will Fight, Kill, or Die For

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Central Alabama
    Posts
    355
    Quote Originally Posted by Gabe Suarez View Post
    Actually it is a fine choice. The FAL makes much more sense than the SCAR. They have plenty of magazines, and parts, and probably all manner of armorer support. All which they would have to re-acquire for the SCAR. And to what end really? The FAL, properly scoped and with good ammunition, can hit to 800 yards with no issues at all...even for civilian guerrillas. I have two such rifles and they are each 1.5 MOA guns.
    This, besides this gets a weapon I really like back in the limelight. And why spend more money investing in a new platform with a adjustable piston gas system when you can modernize the adjustable gas piston system you already have . . .
    Mean Little F@&$%r

    "Be smart enough to avoid most problems, mean enough to strike first, and tough enough to fight back if you get hit."

    "If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." Dalai Lama

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NE AZ @ 5100' elev.
    Posts
    623
    Makes me all warm and tingly inside to hear this news. I have spent the last five years working with my FALs to get to the 800 yard distance. I too am curious how they set them up, it was a large part of the last 5 years for my efforts
    Hi!

    .45/.308/12 gauge kinda guy, but .22 rimfire is where I get my enjoyment.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Pirates have No Borders
    Posts
    32,552
    Quote Originally Posted by snolden View Post
    I have spent the last five years working with my FALs to get to the 800 yard distance. I too am curious how they set them up, it was a large part of the last 5 years for my efforts
    Shortcut: Use expensive Federal Gold Match Ammo and a high magnification MilDot scope (Leupold is minimum). Oh...and the Vltor handguard.
    Gabe Suarez

    Warrior Talk Blog
    Tactical Gear For The Civilian Fighter
    Training For The Martial Civilian

    God - Family - Tribe
    That Is Where Loyalty Lies
    And Those Are The Only Things
    I will Fight, Kill, or Die For

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    SAN ANTONIO, TX
    Posts
    870
    The sad part ia most of these FAL's will have worn out parts and barrels and will still be pressed into service like our old M-14's.

    Now, if they hand select them or overhaul them with new barrels and such (and add Vltor handguards, decent scope) they can have a decent spotter rifle. Time will tell.....
    AKA: infidelprodigy

    A bullet in the head is a bullet in the head.....

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,583
    Out of curiousity, what makes the vltor handgaurd necessary vs a free floated DSA handgaurd? Is it just for mounting a bipod? I would like to replace my current one and am exploring my options. The vltor looks very versitale, I just don't have plans for mounting much up there besides a bipod. Thanks in advance for any replies.
    PSP
    FRS
    FOF
    CRG
    ARG
    0-5

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Travelling through uncharted waters.
    Posts
    2,830
    Quote Originally Posted by Dale Hunter View Post
    The sad part ia most of these FAL's will have worn out parts and barrels and will still be pressed into service like our old M-14's.

    .....
    Dale, as someone who went into the Army in 1967 and trained with M14s until just before leaving for Vietnam I'm here to tell you that the large majority of the M14s the army had and mothballed shortly after that had spent more time in unit arms rooms and parade grounds than they ever did putting rounds down range - square or 2-way. More time was spend carrying a rifle than shooting it - even in Basic Training. The same would hold true for the IDF (Irish Defence Force) L1A1s.

    Old and worn out are not necessarily synonomous.
    Last edited by P.D.; 12-16-2011 at 12:34 PM.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    SAN ANTONIO, TX
    Posts
    870
    Correct, they weren't shot much. But how much time did you spend cleaning them and getting them white glove inspection ready? Horror stories of recruits putting chamber brushes in drills to scrub the chamber clean for a DI jump to mind.

    Over cleaning, over disassembly/reassembly, over-inspecting (by armorers too) of rifles wears them out more than shooting them. That and the M14 wasn't a stellar accurate rifle to begin with. The national match versions get the hype, but a standard M14 was speced to be (with ammo variances) a 4MOA rig. A standard M16 (and M4) is speced to be no more than a 3MOA before being pulled.

    However the MT community and nostalgic generals cling to them.
    AKA: infidelprodigy

    A bullet in the head is a bullet in the head.....

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •