
Originally Posted by
LawDog
Looking at the clip from post #2, I see what is arguably a justifiable defensive shooting. The guy in blue appears far more animated throughout the interaction. The guy in red is hand-on-gun the whole time. You can spin that as either pre-planning a murder or preemptive defense. Either way, he didn’t draw his gun until after the other guy had. When blue pulled his gun, red didn’t try to draw on a drawn gun. He bargained for time, delayed the inevitable confrontation, and waited for blue to allow an opening—which he did by shoving that Tec-9 back into his pants. Once the window was open, red went through it. He drew, fired without hesitation, and kept firing. Then he broke contact as soon as possible and hauled ass. That all looks very defensive to me. Short of drawing and shooting red right out of the gate, which would have put him in a worse legal position, I see little for improvement. I can think of several ways that he could have done worse.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The guy in blue was a puffer fish. All posture and no substance. Little nonverbal’s clued me in to the other guy would be the shooter. Before blue pulled the Tec-9 the shooter had already considered taking the gun out, but changed his mind because of distance and attention from blue. He waited until blue thought his wolf tickets had been bought and his attention was divided. Once the gun was out he didn’t hesitate. Blue ran straight away never leaving the path of the bullets.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jon Payne
Ambassador, Suarez Group of Companies
Suarez International Law Enforcement Instructor
Texas LTC Instructor
The Two Most Dangerous Places in Today's World:
1.) A Gun Free Zone
2.) Your Comfort Zone
I choose to live a peaceful life. It's not hard to change my mind.
Bookmarks