PDA

View Full Version : Battle of the bulge: Scientists discover the real reason for middle-age spread



Beoceorl
08-13-2021, 07:00 AM
No real shockers. The following quotes pretty well summarizes the article:


Piling on the pounds in middle age is an affliction familiar to many, but the common excuse of a slowing metabolism is no longer a valid excuse, according to a new study.

Instead, the dreaded middle-age spread is likely down to lifestyle factors such as exercise and diet.


However, it was not the only unexpected result of the landmark study as it also revealed metabolism remains steady between 20 and 60 years old.

Contrary to what many people think - and tell themselves when they look in the mirror - there is no metabolism go-slow as a person progresses from their 30s to 50s. Metabolism speed was found to decline only when a person reaches 60.

They do say that we experience some changes to our metabolism between birth and 20 years of age, and then again around 60 (although I'm sure things like TRT can mitigate that to a large extent).

Full article:


Battle of the bulge: Scientists discover the real reason for middle-age spread
Joe Pinkstone
Thu, August 12, 2021, 12:55 PM

Piling on the pounds in middle age is an affliction familiar to many, but the common excuse of a slowing metabolism is no longer a valid excuse, according to a new study.

Instead, the dreaded middle-age spread is likely down to lifestyle factors such as exercise and diet.

An international team of researchers, led by Duke University in North Carolina, analysed the speed of a person’s metabolism throughout their life.

Data show that when a baby is born, they use the same amount of energy as adults when accounting for the difference in body size and mass.

However, their metabolism almost instantly goes into hyperdrive, becoming 50 per cent faster by the time they are one year old.

“Something is happening inside a baby’s cells to make them more active, and we don’t know what those processes are yet,” said Herman Pontzer, co-author of the study and associate professor of evolutionary anthropology at Duke University.

This intense pace continues until a child is two, but it then slows by about three per cent a year. The gradual fall continues until adulthood and stabilises around 20 years old.

This finding surprised scientists as it flies in the face of common wisdom, which states that a person’s metabolism speeds up during adolescence.

Myth of the metabolic go-slow debunked
However, it was not the only unexpected result of the landmark study as it also revealed metabolism remains steady between 20 and 60 years old.

Contrary to what many people think - and tell themselves when they look in the mirror - there is no metabolism go-slow as a person progresses from their 30s to 50s. Metabolism speed was found to decline only when a person reaches 60.

More than 6,600 people from 29 countries took part in the study, with individuals ranging in age from one week to 95 years old.

Participants drank special water which consisted of “heavy” isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen that can be tracked to see how swiftly these are flushed out a person’s body.

This allowed scientists to precisely gauge a person’s metabolic speed, and takes into account energy consumed by all bodily processes, from breathing and digesting to working out and walking the dog.

This technique is tried and tested, and decades of data from various institutions was pooled for the study, published in the journal Science. As a result, this study is the most thorough analysis ever done of metabolic speed throughout life.

“All of this points to the conclusion that tissue metabolism, the work that the cells are doing, is changing over the course of the lifespan in ways we haven’t fully appreciated before,” said Dr Pontzer.

Dr Timothy Rhoads, from the department of medicine at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, was not involved in the study and wrote an article on the new findings with Dr Rozalyn Anderson, from the same university.

“The decline from age 60 is thought to reflect a change in tissue-specific metabolism, the energy expended on maintenance,” they write.

“It cannot be a coincidence that the increase in incidence of noncommunicable diseases and disorders begins in this same timeframe.”

Noncommunicable diseases are conditions that cannot be passed from one person to another, such as strokes, heart disease, diabetes and dementia. They become more common with age and account for around 70 per cent of all deaths, according to the World Health Organisation.

Link to article (https://www.yahoo.com/news/battle-bulge-scientists-discover-real-165522680.html)

Shooter76
08-13-2021, 09:10 AM
People get fat when they get lazy and/or over eat... You don't say.

Mr. Anthony
08-13-2021, 09:25 AM
My whole life I've been hearing, "Wait until you turn [20, 25, 30, 35, 40] and your metabolism slows down, then you'll see." Always from people who are out of shape and lack discipline in nutrition and exercise. I've rolled my eyes every time.

Well, I'm 41 and jacked, with abs. Still waiting.

Brent Yamamoto
08-13-2021, 10:02 AM
My whole life I've been hearing, "Wait until you turn [20, 25, 30, 35, 40] and your metabolism slows down, then you'll see." Always from people who are out of shape and lack discipline in nutrition and exercise. I've rolled my eyes every time.

Well, I'm 41 and jacked, with abs. Still waiting.

This.

Gabriel Suarez
08-13-2021, 10:19 AM
61852

Wait until I get what? As Churchill would say, "Balderdash and Poppycock!".

What makes you fat is sloth and a lack of discipline. Live like a warrior...lift like a warrior...eat like a warrior...and age is simply a number.

Middle age spread should be in the chest and shoulders...not in the ass or the gut.

Papa
08-13-2021, 10:48 AM
It's a shame how you've let yourself go.

Dorkface
08-13-2021, 10:49 AM
Middle aged spread should be a sex position or something.

Oscar01
08-13-2021, 03:09 PM
Middle age spread should be in the chest and shoulders...not in the ass or the gut.


Some of the biggest lies ever told: you can't put on more muscle after 20s and red meat + fat will kill you.


In my 30s and still regularly settings PRs. Everyday the medical establishment loses more and more credibility...brb gotta eat my 12 servings of whole grains!


Old age should burn and rave at close of day

BillyOblivion
08-18-2021, 12:52 PM
Some of the biggest lies ever told: you can't put on more muscle after 20s and red meat + fat will kill you.
In my 30s and still regularly settings PRs. Everyday the medical establishment loses more and more credibility...brb gotta eat my 12 servings of whole grains!


I have never seen *anyone* say that you can't put on more muscle after your 20s.

The medical establishment certainly doesn't say this.

I have seen *lots* of people say that after 30 it gets *harder*, and that the older you get, the harder it is. And this is generally true. It doesn't mean that you can't build muscle in your 60s, just that it's a lot harder, happens a lot slower and you need more recovery time than you would have in your 20s or 30s.

Gabriel Suarez
08-18-2021, 02:29 PM
I have seen *lots* of people say that after 30 it gets *harder*, and that the older you get, the harder it is. And this is generally true. It doesn't mean that you can't build muscle in your 60s, just that it's a lot harder, happens a lot slower and you need more recovery time than you would have in your 20s or 30s.

That is true. The more you start with, the better off you are

Faramir2
08-18-2021, 02:32 PM
That is true. The more you start with, the better off you are

Late to that party but working on getting there. Pulled 315 on deadlift Monday and squatted that today, while checking my 1RM numbers with my gym buddy. Time to keep building muscle this semester.

coastalcop
08-19-2021, 06:08 AM
Middle aged spread should be a sex position or something.



It is, called the cougar hoover ;)

Gabriel Suarez
08-19-2021, 06:56 AM
I will add this...FWIW

You can train for strength...as exemplified byba super strong powerlifter and illustratedbin Mark Rippetoe's 5x5 program. Or you can train for hypertrophy as exemplofied by a bodybuilder. To build muscle the focus MUST BE on bodybuilding. When I was focusing on strength I was strong but I didnt have the same low BF muscle mass that I do today. I have been chasing hypertrophy for about 3 years now.

Generally when you run into a 70 year old powerlofter, they are still strong but dont look anybdifferent than anyone else and dont have huge amount of muscle compared to a 70 year old body builder.

Something to think about. More muscle is more better. And me...Id give up some numbers on the big lifts to have more muscle mass on my frame as I close in on 70.

Faramir2
08-19-2021, 08:38 AM
I will add this...FWIW

You can train for strength...as exemplified byba super strong powerlifter and illustratedbin Mark Rippetoe's 5x5 program. Or you can train for hypertrophy as exemplofied by a bodybuilder. To build muscle the focus MUST BE on bodybuilding. When I was focusing on strength I was strong but I didnt have the same low BF muscle mass that I do today. I have been chasing hypertrophy for about 3 years now.

Generally when you run into a 70 year old powerlofter, they are still strong but dont look anybdifferent than anyone else and dont have huge amount of muscle compared to a 70 year old body builder.

Something to think about. More muscle is more better. And me...Id give up some numbers on the big lifts to have more muscle mass on my frame as I close in on 70.

Good point. So far for me, since I'm a long, skinny dude, working toward strength and high numbers (as high as I've gotten them, anyway, which in pure strength terms aren't really impressively high) has also helped build muscle. But I have a feeling that soon I will hit the point, for my build and tendency to amass muscle, that the two paths diverge.

TrailDave
08-19-2021, 08:50 AM
I will add this...FWIW

You can train for strength...as exemplified byba super strong powerlifter and illustratedbin Mark Rippetoe's 5x5 program. Or you can train for hypertrophy as exemplofied by a bodybuilder. To build muscle the focus MUST BE on bodybuilding. When I was focusing on strength I was strong but I didnt have the same low BF muscle mass that I do today. I have been chasing hypertrophy for about 3 years now.

Generally when you run into a 70 year old powerlofter, they are still strong but dont look anybdifferent than anyone else and dont have huge amount of muscle compared to a 70 year old body builder.

Something to think about. More muscle is more better. And me...Id give up some numbers on the big lifts to have more muscle mass on my frame as I close in on 70.

That's a great point. I was always an endurance guy (and PT test guy in the Army) with a very lean build. In my early 30's I started getting under a barbell and within 3 years I was DL and squatting in the 400s, but I didn't look much different -- still tall and lean (6', 175 lbs). Within the last year I've switched from basically doing the big 4 (bench, press, DL, squat) mixed with conditioning and explosive movement training to more of a body-building focus, still mixed with conditioning and explosive movement training (I still have to train for a PT test annually). I've put on 15 pounds in the right areas (arms, chest, upper back) and gone up 2 t-shirt sizes. I feel better, I experience fewer injuries, and when I still check back on the big 4, I'm not moving over 400 anymore, but I'm damn close and I can still get that mile in under 7 minutes. Compared to my friends who are also in their late 30's/early 40's, I look like a rock star. My wife even mentioned that my arms are looking pretty good :naughty:

Gunstore Commando
09-29-2021, 09:11 AM
So what do we like for body-building routines? Old school York -- three sets of 8-12 reps? Old school Arthur Jones -- one all-out set of a bunch of exercises (puke from a set of curls? really? seriously?). Split routines? Or...?

Ryan Taylor
09-29-2021, 10:32 AM
So what do we like for body-building routines? Old school York -- three sets of 8-12 reps? Old school Arthur Jones -- one all-out set of a bunch of exercises (puke from a set of curls? really? seriously?). Split routines? Or...?

Arthur Jones original stuff. Not the stuff that was pushed to sell his machines.

I like full body routines. They are time consuming if you like heavy weights (you need more rest time with heavier sets) but missing a day in the gym is less problematic.

Anything works, consistency is the only real determining factor. By the time youre through your novice stages, you wont have to ask this question, youll know what you like

Gunstore Commando
09-29-2021, 03:09 PM
Arthur Jones original stuff. Not the stuff that was pushed to sell his machines.



I don't believe I have ever seen much from him, actually. Mostly stuff from his disciple, Ellington Darden. A casual look at Amazon doesn't show up much. Where might the material you reference be accessible?