Tell this to liberals and watch as their head spins...

[Warped Mindless]

Some liberals on facebook was spewing some anti-ccw stuff and I thought it would be funny to show them some real stats and see how they would respond.

"Liberals, the odds of dying in a car accident is 1 in 77.4 which is why most of us wear seatbelts. The odds of being the victim of a violent crime is 1 in 46.61. Seeing as how you have a better chance of being a victim of a violent crime doesnt it make sense to carry a legal gun for self defense especially when you consider you wear a selt belt for protection? Then why are so many of you (not all of you I realize) against law abiding citizens carrying firearms?"

Its amazing how mean and violent they turned after they realized how their "logic" fails.

[Brent Yamamoto]

Where do those numbers come from?

[Warped Mindless]

Where do those numbers come from?

Its what came up when I did a quick google search.

One came from some .gov site and the other from a .edu site. I should have wrote them down.

[Vigilant]

Where do those numbers come from?
95% of statistics are made up on the spot!

[Jon Payne]

95% of statistics are made up on the spot!

And 60% of the time they're 100% correct.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Shooter76]

You wanna see their heads spin... Ask them to explain why they think the Founders were so concerned someone would take away the military's right to be armed that they enshrined it in the Bill of Rights?

[Benjamin Liu]

You wanna see their heads spin... Ask them to explain why they think the Founders were so concerned someone would take away the military's right to be armed that they enshrined it in the Bill of Rights?

They have no good answer for that one, which is to be expected since the entire idea that the government would restrict itself from itself of its own right to be armed is completely absurd.

They'll not get confused, however. They'll just respond with insults.

[Benjamin Liu]

Maybe their heads will spin if you brought in an exorcist. :laughing:




On the car issue, it really depends on what type of commie they are. Some types do want cars banned, it depends on how much of an environmentalist or SJW they are.

While some of these practice what they preach, most want to keep their own cars, they just want YOU to not have a car.

[R. Lafayette]

These are the type of facts I like to serve up into their faces:

2015 murders in Baltimore = 343
Committed by active shooters/terrorists: 0
Committed by CCW holders: 0
Committed by active shooters or terrorists: 0
Committed by urban thugs: 343

2015 murders in DC = 162
Committed by active shooters/terrorists: 0
Committed by CCW holders: 0
Committed by active shooters or terrorists: 0
Committed by urban thugs: 162

2015 murders in Chicago = 487
Committed by active shooters/terrorists: 0
Committed by urban thugs: 487

2015 murders in Philadelphia = 280
Committed by active shooters/terrorists: 0
Committed by urban thugs: 280

[Texican_gal]

They'll not get confused, however. They'll just respond with insults.

Yeah, this is their modus craperandi. I finally learned that you will never be able to really debate anything with them. They don't honor rules; they chimp out immediately; and if you're a Southerner, according to their "rules," you are always wrong anyway.

[warriorscience4u]

More than 50% of the firearm related deaths last year, which the POTUS and his clan are crying about, were self-inflicted GSWs. Done; tell them to fight suicide or start handing out the pills so the rest of us can get on with OUR lives.

They're moronic idiocy of gun grabbing is being done while standing on 14 fresh graves in Cali., they have NO respect, stand em up.

[oldranger53]

95% of statistics are made up on the spot!
There's a 100% chance that I will counter aggression with even greater aggression!

<Sent from phone. Typos possible.>

[TyGuy04]

You wanna see their heads spin... Ask them to explain why they think the Founders were so concerned someone would take away the military's right to be armed that they enshrined it in the Bill of Rights?

Irrelevant. Unfortunately, most of them genuinely do not care what 'some dead guys from over 200 years ago' think. Since there is the broad liberal belief that there are no absolute values and everything is subjective, then principles from long past aren't relative today. Sigh.

[emtdaddy1980]

Seeing a liberal's head spin sounds more fun if I'm the one applying the necessary tortion.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk